Re Eureca Corporation Ltd.

Read the full judgment text of HCCW 1341/2001 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 June 2002.

1. This petition for winding-up is presented by Fortis Bank Asia HK on 13 December 2001 on the basis of a statutory demand served on the Company on 27 September 2001 demanding payments of US$4,315,843.18. The matter first came before Deputy Judge Woolley on 4 March 2002. As the petition was opposed by some contributories, directions were given for evidence to be filed by the opposing contributories within 42 days and for the petitioner to reply 42 days thereafter.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCW 1341/2001
Court
High Court CFI
Date03 Jun 2002
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCW001341/2001

HCCW 1341/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1341 OF 2001

____________

IN THE MATTER of Eureca Corporation Limited (Company Number: 471797)

AND

IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance, Chapter 32

____________

Coram: Hon Kwan J in Court

Date of Hearing: 3 June 2002

Date of Judgment: 3 June 2002

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

1.This petition for winding-up is presented by Fortis Bank Asia HK on 13 December 2001 on the basis of a statutory demand served on the Company on 27 September 2001 demanding payments of US$4,315,843.18. The matter first came before Deputy Judge Woolley on 4 March 2002. As the petition was opposed by some contributories, directions were given for evidence to be filed by the opposing contributories within 42 days and for the petitioner to reply 42 days thereafter.

2.To date, no evidence has been filed by the opposing contributories and they have not appeared today. In the circumstances, I make a winding-up order against the Company with costs to the petitioner to be paid out of the assets of the Company.

(S Kwan)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Representation:

Mr Sit Wing Kun Dennis, instructed by Messrs Hwang & Co., for the Petitioner

The Opposing Contributories, represented by Messrs Sinclair Roche & Temperley, absent

Ms Teresa Wong, for the Official Receiver

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCCW 1341/2001