Read the full judgment text of HCA 001732/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 May 2002 before Deputy High Court Judge Poon.
Company law – interim injunction – boardroom dispute – two warring camps of shareholders competing for control of plaintiff company listed on Hong Kong Stock Exchange – appointment of 34 additional directors – re-election of 5th to 9th defendants at AGM – removal of managing director and chairman – whether rule in Foss v. Harbottle bars action by company in its own name – whether 5th to 9th defendants were 'retiring directors' under Bye-law 99(A) and deemed re-elected under Bye-law 100 after withdrawal of re-election resolution – whether purported appointment of 34 Additional Directors valid, including allegation of forgery of board minutes – whether 3rd and 4th defendants validly removed as managing director and chairman – balance of convenience under American Cyanamid principle – 1st and 2nd defendants excused from attendance – Injunction Summons granted, Authority and Inspection Summons adjourned, Company's Summons dismissed – plaintiff is Bermuda-incorporated company with shares suspended since November 2000 – receivership order made on 14 February 2001 in derivative action HCA 10063/2000 – SGM on 15 April 2002 increased maximum number of directors from 20 to 41 and elected 21 SGM directors – 3rd defendant appointed 34 Additional Directors on 8 and 9 April 2002 – SGM directors removed 3rd defendant as managing director and 4th defendant as chairman on 19 April and 7 May 2002 – plaintiff given undertaking as to damages – costs to be plaintiff's costs in the cause – certificate for two counsel – liberty to apply for directions for speedy trial – Foss v. Harbottle rule inapplicable as action brought in name of plaintiff company – serious question to be tried on validity of re-election of 5th to 9th defendants following Eyre v. Milton Proprietary Limited – serious question to be tried on validity of Additional Directors' appointment including alleged forgery of minutes – court accepted validity of removal of 3rd and 4th defendants for present purposes – balance of convenience favoured injunction to prevent board deadlock, disruption to winding-up proceedings HCCW 164/2002, and impairment of communications with HKEx and SFC
Legal issues: Application of the rule in Foss v. Harbottle · Validity of re-election of 5th to 9th defendants at AGM · Validity of appointment of Additional Directors · Removal of 3rd and 4th defendants as managing director and chairman · Balance of convenience for interim injunction
Outcome: Interim injunction granted against the 3rd to 43rd defendants until trial or further order, subject to the plaintiff's undertaking as to damages. Authority Summons adjourned to a date to be fixed for directions with costs reserved. Inspection Summons adjourned sine die with liberty to restore, costs reserved. Company's Summons dismissed, with costs reserved pending determination of whether AL had the requisite authority to commence HCA 1874/2002.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases