Read the full judgment text of CACC 000378/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 February 1999.
1. Subject to any argument which Mr. Reading wishes to address as to the application of the proviso, we are in a position to indicate now that we are satisfied there is merit in the first ground of the appeal such as to warrant the quashing of the conviction. That is to say we are satisfied that crucial documentary evidence was wrongly introduced under section 22 of the Evidence Ordinance, Cap.8, which was used to establish the truth of the contents of the documents to be admitted. We shall, in