Re Gainway International Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCW 1069/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 December 2003.

1. This is a petition to wind up Gainway International Limited ("the Company") presented by Dhandia Rajiv Jain trading as Thai Gems on the basis of a judgment debt obtained in HCA No. 628 of 2003. The amount of the judgment debt was $1,050,151.67. After execution on the judgment debt was levied by the petitioner, there was part satisfaction to the extent of $435,350.00.

Case No.HCCW 1069/2003
Court
High Court CFI
Date01 Dec 2003
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCW001069/2003

HCCW 1069/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1069 OF 2003

____________

IN THE MATTER of GAINWAY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

AND

IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance, Chapter 32

____________

Coram: Hon Kwan J in Court

Date of Hearing: 1 December 2003

Date of Judgment: 1 December 2003

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

1.This is a petition to wind up Gainway International Limited ("the Company") presented by Dhandia Rajiv Jain trading as Thai Gems on the basis of a judgment debt obtained in HCA No. 628 of 2003. The amount of the judgment debt was $1,050,151.67. After execution on the judgment debt was levied by the petitioner, there was part satisfaction to the extent of $435,350.00.

2.On 1 August 2003, a demand was served by the petitioner on the Company for the balance of the judgment debt and fixed costs in the total sum of $616,351.67. As the demand was not met, the petition was presented on 22 September 2003. Notice to act for the Company was filed on 10 November 2003.

3.At the first hearing on 17 November 2003, I was informed by counsel appearing for the Company that the petitioning debt is not in dispute and the Company sought two weeks' adjournment to explore the possibility of a settlement.

4.At the hearing today, counsel for the Company informed me that the solicitors have no further instructions to act for the Company and a settlement has not been reached.

5.In the circumstances, I make an order to wind up the Company. I order that the petitioner's costs are to be paid out of the Company's assets.

(S Kwan)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Representation:

Mr Victor Luk, instructed by Messrs Massie & Clement, for the Petitioner

Mr Herbert Leung, instructed by Messrs Yuen & Partners, for the Company

Miss Vivian Yeung, for the Official Receiver