Read the full judgment text of HCA 012093/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 May 2003.
1. This is an application for the admission at the trial of this action of the evidence of Lam Pik Yue ["Lam"] by way of affirmation. In the summons of 29 April 2003, the application was made under Order 38 Rule 2. In the course of argument, Mr Yu (counsel for the Plaintiff) advanced an alternative argument that apart from Order 38 Rule 2, the affirmation should be admitted as evidence by virtue of Section 47 of the Evidence Ordinance. A hearsay notice dated 16 April 2003 has been served in resp
Cites 1 case