Stikeman, Elliott v. Wong Ming Yuen and Another

CACV000113M/1983

Between

________

Coram:    Court of Appeal (Leonard, V-P., Cons and Fuad, JJA.)

Date of Judgment: 10th February, 1984

______________

(CORRIGENDA)

______________

1.          The word "ingenuous" that appears on line 5 of page 26 of the judgment should be amended to read "ingenious".

2.        The word "fact" that appears on the last line of page 26 should be amended to read "face".

3.        The figure "C$14,000" that appears on line 3 of page 28 should be amended to read "C$40,000".

Representation: