Read the full judgment text of CACV 4062/2001 on BabelCite. This 高等法院上訴法庭 judgment was delivered on 14 June 2002 before Hon Rogers VP, Le Pichon JA.
Civil Appeal — Contract Dispute — Compliance with prior order — Effect on Appeal Decision — The Court of Appeal considered an addendum to its judgment clarifying that although the Order of Burrell J in the ACE action, referred to in the original judgment, had in fact been complied with, this did not affect the Court's decision on appeal. The parties were SECAN LIMITED (Plaintiff/Respondent) and HSIN YIEH ARCHITECTS & ASSOCIATES LTD. (Defendant/Appellant). Representation was by Mr Simon Westbrook SC for the Plaintiff and Mr Nicholas Cooney for the Defendant. The appeal related to a case from HCCT No. 69 of 2001. The addendum dated 20 June 2002 confirms that despite the compliance with the prior order, the Court's legal conclusions and orders remain as originally decided on 14 June 2002.
Outcome: The Court's decision remains unchanged despite compliance with Burrell J's order in the ACE action.
Cites 1 case