Chan Ming v. Wayfair Investment Ltd. Trading in the Name of Wayfair Warehousing Co.

Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite..

1. Page 13, the 11th line should read as "$97,546.66" instead of "$91,813.32";

Cites 1 case

Case No.
Court
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCEC000188N/1996

DCEC 188 of 1996

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION CASE NO. 188 of 96

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION

__________

BETWEEN:
CHAN Ming Applicant
AND
Wayfair Investment Limited Trading in the name of Wayfair Warehousing Company Respondent

______________________________

SECOND CORRIGENDUM

______________________________

Kindly note the following correction in the Judgment of the above mentioned case handed down by the H.H. Judge Carlson on 11 January 2001:-

1. Page 13, the 11th line should read as "$97,546.66" instead of "$91,813.32";

2. Same page, the 19th line, should read as "$99,972.66" instead of "$94,239.32".

Dated 1st February 2001

(E. Lau) (Ms.)
Clerk to H.H. Judge Carlson

Chan Ming v. Wayfair Investment Ltd. Trading in the Name of Wayfair Warehousing Co. [] | BabelCite