A Co. v. B Co.

HCMP000336M/2002

HCMP 336/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS
NO. 336 OF 2002

------------------------------

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D A

-------------------------------

Kindly note the following corrections in the Judgment of the above case handed down by the Honourable Mr. Justice Ma on 12 March 2002:

Paragraph 11, 6th line, the citation Bankers Trust Company v. Shapira [1980] 1 WLR 124 should read as "[1980] 1 WLR 1274"

Paragraph 12, 2nd line the fifth word "emphasis" should read as "emphasize", and also in the 4th line, the sixth word, the same situation applies.

Paragraph 13(1), 6th line, after the last word "likely" add "be" so that the sentence should read "All the more so when the alleged wrongdoer is not and will not likely be before the court."

Paragraph 25, 3rd line, after the word "has" add "been" so that the sentence should read "A very serious case of breach of fiduciary duty has been made out, a breach in ..........."

Paragraph 37, last line, the fifth word "effective" be substituted with "ineffective" so that the sentence should read "The underlying reason for the grant of a Mareva injunction is to ensure that proceedings brought by a plaintiff are not rendered ineffective or even nugatory."

Dated 2nd October, 2002.