|
HCMP000562M/1992
HCMP 562/92
HCMP 2084/94
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NOS.562 OF 1992 AND 2084 OF 1994
-------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
TO KAN CHI (陶根池) |
1st Plaintiffs |
|
TO FUK TIM (陶福添) |
|
|
and |
|
|
TO KAM CHAU (陶鑑籌) (as managers of the) TO KA YI TSO (陶嘉儀祖) |
|
|
TO CHEONG LAM(陶昌林) |
2nd Plaintiffs |
|
TO SIU LAM (陶兆林) |
|
|
TO MEI LUN (陶美粦) |
|
|
TO MAN HING (陶萬興) |
|
|
and |
|
|
TO MUK TAI (陶木泰) (as representatives of the To Clan) |
|
|
|
|
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
|
PUI MAN YAU (斐文有) alias SIK KWOK WAH (釋覺華) |
1st Defendant |
|
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL |
2nd Defendant |
|
CHAN YAT SAN (陳日新) |
3rd Defendants |
|
LAU WONG FAT (劉皇發) |
|
|
and |
|
|
HO SUN WING (何新榮) |
|
|
THE SECRETARY FOR HOME AFFAIRS INCORPORATED |
4th Defendant |
|
PUI MAN YAU (斐文有) alias SIK KWOK WAH (釋覺華), the personal representative of TAT ON, deceased |
5th Defendant |
-------------
(Consolidated by the Order of the Honourable Mr Justice J Chan
dated 26 January 1996)
----------------------------
Corrigendum
----------------------------
Kindly note the following corrections in the judgment of the above-mentioned case delivered by the Honourable Mr. Justice Yam in Court on 26 November, 1998:-
Corrections in English judgment:
| Chapter 1, p.2, line (J) |
The word "was" should read "had been" |
|
|
| Chapter 1, p.2, between line (M) and line (N) |
The word "were" should be deleted |
|
|
| Chapter 1, p.5, line (K) |
The word "up" should be inserted after "1936" |
|
|
| Chapter 2, p.2, between line (E) and line (F) |
The word "are" should read "were" |
|
|
| Chapter 2, p.3, between line (R) and line (S): |
The word "are" should read "were" |
|
|
| Chapter 2, p.4, between line (E) and line (F): |
The word "have" should read "had" |
|
|
| Chapter 2, p.4, between line (F) and line (G): |
The word "shall" should read "should" |
|
|
| Chapter 2, p.5, line (G): |
The word "his" should read "the" |
|
|
| Chapter 2, p.7, between line (F) and line (G): |
"It is the 1st Defendant acting" should read "The 1st Defendant acted" |
|
|
| Chapter 2, p.11,between line (R) : |
The word "goes" should read "went" |
|
|
| Chapter 3, p.2, between line (S) and line (T): |
The word "if" should read "should" |
|
|
| Chapter 7, p.1, between line (R) and line (S) : |
"熱善" should read "慈善" |
|
|
| Chapter 7, p.14, line (E) : |
The word "manger" should read "manager" |
|
|
| Chapter 8, p.12, line (O) : |
The word "manger" should read "manager" |
|
|
| Corrections in Chinese judgment: |
|
|
|
| 第五章第23頁(M)行 : |
"香港管治權" 更正為 "香港新界管治權" |
|
|
| 第七章第1頁(P)行: |
" 熱善" 更正為 "慈善" |
|
|
| 第八章第9頁(P)行和(Q)之間: |
" 以" 更正為 "已" |
|
|
| Appendix(附件): |
|
|
|
| Appendix 3 (附件三): |
"熱善" 更正為 "慈善" |
|
The character "熱善" should read "慈善" |
Dated the 21st day of September, 2000
|
(Susanna Fong)(Miss) |
|
Clerk to Hon. Yam, J. |
|