Konhill International Ltd. v. Dai Pai Dong Retail Shops Co. Ltd. and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2446/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 October 2002.

1. At paragraph 14(1)(a), "without paying to the Petitioner, at the same time, an amount equal to any sum as may have been paid.." should read as "without paying to the Petitioner, at the same time, an amount (less the sum of HK$400,000 referred to in paragraph 2 of this Order) equal to any sum as may have been paid.."

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 2446/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date06 Oct 2002
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP002446N/2002

HCA 2446 /2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 2446 OF 2002

____________

IN THE MATTER OF Dai Pai Dong Retail Shops Company Limited

AND

IN THE MATTER OF S. 168A of the Companies ordinance (Cap 32)

BETWEEN
KONHILL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Petitioner
AND
DAI PAI DONG RETAIL SHOPS COMPANY LIMITED 1st Respondent

DAI PAI DONG FOOD COMPANY LIMITED

2nd Respondent

CITY ACTION LIMITED

3rd Respondent

KAMPERY DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

4th Respondent

____________

Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Saunders in Chambers

Date of Judgment: 6 October 2002

_______________

CORRIGIENDA

_______________

Kindly note the following correction in the Judgment of the above mentioned case handed down by Deputy High Court Judge Saunders on 31 October 2002 :-

1. At paragraph 14(1)(a), "without paying to the Petitioner, at the same time, an amount equal to any sum as may have been paid.." should read as "without paying to the Petitioner, at the same time, an amount (less the sum of HK$400,000 referred to in paragraph 2 of this Order) equal to any sum as may have been paid.."

Dated this 7th day of November, 2002

(H.S.CHEUNG)
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Saunders

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2446/2002