BabelCite

Montres Tudor S.A. v. Concord Watch Co. S.A.

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 5789/2000 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 July 2001.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 5789/2000
Court
High Court CFI
Date25 Jul 2001
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP005789/2000

HCMP 5789/2000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 5789 OF 2000

IN THE MATTER OF Section 15 of the Trade Marks Ordinance (Cap. 43)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against the decision of Assistant Trade Marks Registrar Kripas dated 18 August 2000 in relation to an opposition filed by Montres Tudor S.A. to Trade Mark Application No. 6531 of 1993 in Class 14 by Concord Watch Co. S.A.

BETWEEN
Montres Tudor S.A. Appellant
(Opponent)
AND
Concord Watch Co. S.A. Respondent
(Applicant)

Coram: Hon. Sakhrani J in Court

Date of Hearing: 5 and 7 July 2001

Date of Judgment: 25 July 2001

___________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

___________________________

At page 19 line D, the word "There" should read as "They".

Dated the 17th September 2001.

(G. Cheng)
Clerk to Hon. Sakhrani J.

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Montres Tudor S.A. v. Concord Watch Co. S.A.
HCMP 5789/2000
High Court CFI25 Jul 2001
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 5789/2000

Montres Tudor S.A. v. Concord Watch Co. S.A.
High Court CFI25 Jul 2001