Wang Din Shin v. Nina Kung

Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 28 June 2004.

2. “certainly des not” as shown on line G on page 159, paragraph 821 be amended to “certainly does not”.”

Cited by 1 case

Case No.[2004] HKCA 205
Court
Date28 Jun 2004
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO.460 OF 2002

(on appeal from HCA P8 of 1999)

__________________

BETWEEN    
  WANG DIN SHIN Respondent
  and  
  NINA KUNG alias NINA T.H. WANG Appellant

__________________

Before : Hon Yeung JA, Yuen JA & Waung J in Court

Date of Hearing : 29 – 30 September, 2 – 3, 6 – 10, 13 -17, 20 – 24, 27 – 31 October,          1, 3 – 5 November 2003

Date of Judgment :  28 June 2004

----------------------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-----------------------------------------------

The amendments are as follows : -

 

“1. “leading counsel for the Wife” as shown on line R-S on page 55, paragraph 293 be amended to “leading counsel for the Father”.

  2. “certainly des not” as shown on line G on page 159, paragraph 821 be amended to “certainly does not”.”

 

Dated the 7th day of  July 2004.

  (Carmen LEE) (Miss)
  Clerk to HonYeung JA
Wang Din Shin v. Nina Kung [] | BabelCite