Read the full judgment text of FAMC 000027/2004 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 27 September 2004.
1. In this application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, two questions have been put forward as questions of great and general importance. One is whether a charge of dealing with property known or believed to represent the proceeds of an indictable offence, contrary to s.25(1) and (3) of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 455, is a nullity if the underlying offence is not specified. In our view it is not reasonably arguable that such a charge is a nullity.