Wong Hei Chun v. Chong Ming Shih
Read the full judgment text of DCPI 429/2004 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Plaintiff was injured by the Defendant on 30 th January 2001 when he used a hammer to knock on the door of the Plaintiff’s room. The hammer hit the Plaintiff’s right eye. As a result she suffered injuries. The Plaintiff now claims for damages arising out of this incident.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
DCPI 429/2004 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 429 OF 2004 ---------------------
--------------------- Coram: H.H. Judge Wong in Court Date of Hearing: 10th September 2004 Date of Delivery of Judgment: 30th September 2004 _________________________ JUDGMENT _________________________ Plaintiff’s Claim 1.The Plaintiff was injured by the Defendant on 30th January 2001 when he used a hammer to knock on the door of the Plaintiff’s room. The hammer hit the Plaintiff’s right eye. As a result she suffered injuries. The Plaintiff now claims for damages arising out of this incident. 2.Defendant appeared for assessment of damages. Injury & Disabilities 3.As a result the Plaintiff suffered the following injuries:-
4.She now suffers the following disabilities:-
Plaintiff’s pre-injury earning 5.The Plaintiff was 58 years of age at the time of the injury earning $6,550 as a cashier at Vinci Park Services HK Ltd. with $327.50 MPF. She was granted sick leave for 2 months and 7 days and was dismissed on 30th March 2003. 6.She received $3,165.00 from Social Welfare Department since 26th August 2003. PSLA 7.The nearest case similar to the Plaintiff’s present disability is Kwan Shek Sang v. Chan Kam Wah [2003] 2 HKLRD 967 in which the Plaintiff was found to have a metallic foreign body embedded in the left half of the right cornea. Examination revealed a right corneal paraxial scar, and the vision of the right eye was 6/12. The permanent visual impairment of the eye was 15%. Further, it was noted that Plaintiff suffered a corneal opacity in the right eye. The best corrected central vision of that eye was 20/80, the impaired peripheral vision suggested that half of the left visual field was missing, and there was also impaired colour vision. PSLA was fixed at $280,000. Loss of Earning
Medical & Travelling Expenses
Loss of Future Earnings 10.Since she is now 61, although she said she could work until 65 I adopt a multiplier of 2. 11.The loss of future earning is therefore $[(6,550 x 1.05) – 3,165] x 24 = $89,100. Future Medical Expenses $13,000 12.Damages for the Plaintiff is therefore assessed at:-
13.Costs to the Plaintiff. Certificate for Counsel. 14.Plaintiff’s own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
Mr. Simon H.W. Lam instructed by Messrs. David Hui & Co. assigned by D.L.A. for the Plaintiff Defendant: Chong Ming Shih(莊銘), in person, present. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case