Dynasty Jewelry (Hong Kong) and Chu on Kwok t/a Muses Jewellry Co
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 2803/2003 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 26 November 2004.
1. On page 3: “3. 於 2003 年 5 月 7 日 ……” should be read as “4. 於 2003 年 5 月 7 日 …...”
Cites 1 case
|
DCCJ 2803/2003 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO. DCCJ 2803 OF 2003 ____________ BETWEEN
___________
Before: His Honour Judge To in Court Date of Hearing: 24 & 25 August 2004 Date of Judgment: 26 November 2004 ______________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ______________________ 1.On page 3: “3. 於2003年5月7日……” should be read as “4. 於2003年5月7日…...” 2.On Page 3: “4. 於2003年9月24日……”should be read as “5. 於2003年9月24日……” 3.On Page 3: “5. 於審訊時,” should be read as “6. 於審訊時,” 4.On Page 3: “6. 原告人證人黃崇耀……” should be read as “7. 原告人證人黃崇耀……” 5.One Page 4: “7. 被告人在他的抗辯書……” should be read as “8. 被告人在他的抗辯書……” 6.On Page 6: “15. 被告人稱原告人於某日……” should be read as “14. 被告人稱原告人於某日……” 7.On Page 6: “16. 原告人不爭議他…..” should be read as “15. 原告人不爭議他……” 8.On Page 6: “17. 被告人指他在2003年……” should be read as “16. 被告人指他在2003年……” 9.One Page 7: “18. 在本案中,原告人的……” should be read as “17. 在本案中,原告人的……” 10.One Page 7: “19. 至於本案所涉及……” should be read as “18. 至於本案所涉及……” 11.One Page 7: “20. 基於上述理由,……” should be read as “19. 基於上述理由,……”
Dated the 23rd day of December 2004 |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 2803/2003