Case Document

DCCJ 4398 / 2002

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO. DCCJ 4398 OF 2002

BETWEEN

Before: Deputy District Judge Tracy Chan in Court

Date of hearing: 17 January 2005 to 21 January 2005

Date of handing down Judgment: 25 February 2005

CORRIGENDUM

Please be informed that on page 30, paragraphs 85 and 86 as follows

“ 85.	Judgment for the Plaintiff against the Defendant in the sum of

	(a)	Outstanding payment		$238,562.37
	(b)	Expenses
		(i)	Freight charges	$6,222.82
		(ii)	Transportation costs	$550.00
		(iii)	Surveyor’s costs	$7,919.00
		(iv)	Monthly storage charges	$22,000.00
			(27.5.2002 to 26.3.2003)
			2200 x 10M
		(v)	Monthly storage charges	$50,600.00
			(27.3.2003 to day of Judgment)
			2200 x 23M
			--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
			Total :	$325,854.19

86.	I order that there is interest at half judgment rate from date of writ to judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment in full. The Defendant should also bear costs of this action, to be taxed if not agreed.”

should read

“85	Judgment for the Plaintiff against the Defendant in the sum of

	(a)	Outstanding payment		$238,562.37
	(b)	Expenses
		(i)	Freight charges	$6,222.82
		(ii)	Transportation costs	$550.00
		(iii)	Surveyor’s costs	$7,919.00
		(iv)	Monthly storage charges	$2,200.00
			(27.5.2002 to 26.3.2003)
			220 x 10M
		(v)	Monthly storage charges	$5,060.00
			(27.3.2003 to day of Judgment)
			220 x 23M
			--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
			Total :	$260,514.19

86.	I order that there is interest at half judgment rate from date of writ to judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment in full. The Defendant should also bear costs of this action inclusive of the Plaintiff’s claim and its own counterclaim, to be taxed if not agreed.”

Dated this 28^th day of February 2005.

	Signed
	(M. Pang)(Miss)
	Clerk to Deputy District Court Judge Tracy Chan

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 4398/2002