Dr Paul Ki Ping Ki v. Next Magazine Publishing Ltd and Others
Read the full judgment text of CACV 33/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 20 January 2005.
1. This court has no alternative but to dismiss this application. It does not come within section 22(1)(a) for the reasons that it is not a final appeal and the amount involved is not sufficient to bring it within that subsection anyway. In my view, it would be wrong for this court to grant leave to appeal in view of the judgment which we gave on 4 November which is self-explanatory and, on the basis of that judgment, any appeal would be doomed to failure.
Cited by 3 cases
|
CACV33/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 33 of 2004 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 4173 OF 2001) ______________________ BETWEEN
______________________ Before: Hon Rogers VP & Le Pichon JA in Court Date of Hearing: 20 January 2005 Date of Judgment: 20 January 2005 __________________ J U D G M E N T __________________ Hon Rogers VP: 1.This court has no alternative but to dismiss this application. It does not come within section 22(1)(a) for the reasons that it is not a final appeal and the amount involved is not sufficient to bring it within that subsection anyway. In my view, it would be wrong for this court to grant leave to appeal in view of the judgment which we gave on 4 November which is self-explanatory and, on the basis of that judgment, any appeal would be doomed to failure. Hon Le Pichon JA: 2.I agree.
The Plaintiff/Applicant, in person (present) Mr Kenneth W H Ng, instructed by Messrs Deacons, for the 1st, 3rd & 5th Defendants/Respondents |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 33/2004