Re Ma Pui Tung
Read the full judgment text of HCB 19884/2003 on BabelCite. This HCB judgment was delivered on 28 May 2004.
1. After a contested hearing, and in a written judgment handed down on 17 May 2004, I made a bankruptcy order against the debtor with cost.
Cites 1 case
|
HCB 19884/2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE BANKRUPTCYPROCEEDINGS NO. 19884 OF 2003 ____________
____________ Before: Hon Chung J in Court Date of Hearing: 28 May 2004 Date of Handing Down Judgment: 28 May 2004 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ Introduction 1.After a contested hearing, and in a written judgment handed down on 17 May 2004, I made a bankruptcy order against the debtor with cost. 2.The debtor took out an application on 20 May 2004 which seeks to rescind the bankruptcy order and asks for 3 weeks to pay the debt based on which the bankruptcy petition was founded. 3.The debtor clarifies during today’s hearing that this application is bought pursuant to s. 98(1), Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6). When queried by the court, the debtor contends that there is no need for any change of circumstances before the court’s jurisdiction under that provision can be invoked. He is, however, unable to refer to any authorities or textbooks in support. 4.I am willing, for the purposes of this application, to assume in the debtor’s favour that there may be exceptional cases where that jurisdiction can be invoked even though no change of circumstances has taken place between the date of the bankruptcy order and the date of the application made under s. 98(1), Cap. 6. There is, however, insufficient evidence presented in this application to warrant the exercise of that power. 5.For the above reason, this application is refused. [After hearing the parties, fixed costs of $3,600 were awarded to each of the Petitioner and the Official Receiver]
Mr Henson K L Lam, of Messrs Lo Wong & Tsui, for the Petitioner Debtor acts in person and present Ms C F Sit, of Official Receiver’s Office |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCB 19884/2003