Li Lai Fun and Another v. Leung Yiu Cheung and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 697/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 November 2004.

1. The word “10” in Line O of paragraph 88 should be substituted by the word “5”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 697/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date20 Nov 2004
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 697/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 697 OF 2002

_________________________

BETWEEN

 

LI LAI FUN and CHOI CHI MING
Administrators of the estate of CHAI
(or CHOI) KAI CHUEN, Deceased

Plaintiffs

 

And

 

LEUNG YIU CHEUNG

1st Defendant

 

LAU SUI YIM

2nd Defendant

 

LAU SHIU KONG

3rd Defendant

_________________________

Coram : Before Master Levy in Court

Dates of Hearing : 17 and 18 June 2004, 15 and 25 September 2004

Date of Handing Down of Judgment : 20 November 2004

______________________________

CORRIGENDUM

______________________________

1.The word “10” in Line O of paragraph 88 should be substituted by the word “5”.

2.The word “10” in Line E of paragraph 89 should be substituted by the word “5”.

3.The word “10” in Line H of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “5”.

4.The word “$96,000”in Line J of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “$46,000”, “$21,000 x 10%” should be substituted by “$1,000”.

5.The word “$187,000 ($17,000 x10% x 110 months (13 years – 46 months” in Lines K to L of paragraph 90 should be substituted by “$132,600 ($850 x 13 x 12)”.

6.The word “$283,600” in Line L of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “$178,600”.

7.The word “$567,000” in Line M of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “$357,200”.

8.The word “$567,000” in Line N of paragraph 91 should be substituted by the word “$357,200”.

9.The word “$800,000 as pleaded in the Revised Statement of Damages” in Lines P to Q of paragraph 91 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”.

10.The word “$800,000” in Line S of paragraph 91 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”.

11.The word “$800,000” in Line A under subheading (c) should be substituted by the word “$650,000”.

12.The word “$800,000” in Lines C, I and K of paragraph 92 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”.

13.The word “$800,000” in Line P of paragraph 93 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”.

14.The word “$300,000” in Line J of paragraph 98 should be substituted by the word “$150,000”.

15.The word “$200,000” in Line K of paragraph 98 should be substituted by the word “$100,000”.

16.The word “$200,000” in Line K of paragraph 104 should be substituted by the word “$100,000”.

17.The word “$200,000” in Line P of the Summary should be substituted by the word “$100,000”.

18.The word “$2,585,068” in Line S of the Summary should be substituted by the word “$2,485,068”.

19.The word “$2,585,068” in Line Q of paragraph 111 should be substituted by the word “$2,485,068”.

 

Leia Wan
Clerk to Master Levy

Dated this 8th day of April 2005

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 697/2002