Li Lai Fun and Another v. Leung Yiu Cheung and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCPI 697/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 November 2004.
1. The word “10” in Line O of paragraph 88 should be substituted by the word “5”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCPI 697/2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 697 OF 2002 _________________________ BETWEEN
_________________________ Coram : Before Master Levy in Court Dates of Hearing : 17 and 18 June 2004, 15 and 25 September 2004 Date of Handing Down of Judgment : 20 November 2004 ______________________________ CORRIGENDUM ______________________________ 1.The word “10” in Line O of paragraph 88 should be substituted by the word “5”. 2.The word “10” in Line E of paragraph 89 should be substituted by the word “5”. 3.The word “10” in Line H of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “5”. 4.The word “$96,000”in Line J of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “$46,000”, “$21,000 x 10%” should be substituted by “$1,000”. 5.The word “$187,000 ($17,000 x10% x 110 months (13 years – 46 months” in Lines K to L of paragraph 90 should be substituted by “$132,600 ($850 x 13 x 12)”. 6.The word “$283,600” in Line L of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “$178,600”. 7.The word “$567,000” in Line M of paragraph 90 should be substituted by the word “$357,200”. 8.The word “$567,000” in Line N of paragraph 91 should be substituted by the word “$357,200”. 9.The word “$800,000 as pleaded in the Revised Statement of Damages” in Lines P to Q of paragraph 91 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”. 10.The word “$800,000” in Line S of paragraph 91 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”. 11.The word “$800,000” in Line A under subheading (c) should be substituted by the word “$650,000”. 12.The word “$800,000” in Lines C, I and K of paragraph 92 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”. 13.The word “$800,000” in Line P of paragraph 93 should be substituted by the word “$650,000”. 14.The word “$300,000” in Line J of paragraph 98 should be substituted by the word “$150,000”. 15.The word “$200,000” in Line K of paragraph 98 should be substituted by the word “$100,000”. 16.The word “$200,000” in Line K of paragraph 104 should be substituted by the word “$100,000”. 17.The word “$200,000” in Line P of the Summary should be substituted by the word “$100,000”. 18.The word “$2,585,068” in Line S of the Summary should be substituted by the word “$2,485,068”. 19.The word “$2,585,068” in Line Q of paragraph 111 should be substituted by the word “$2,485,068”.
Dated this 8th day of April 2005 |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 697/2002