Read the full judgment text of CACC 000104/1994 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 3 July 1998.
1. This is a very unusual appeal. The applicant faced one charge of conspiracy and two charges of theft. The conspiracy which was stated to be contrary to common law and to s.9 of the Theft Ordinance, particularized that he, together with six named others, on divers days between May 1992 and June 1992, conspired together and with other persons not in custody to steal motor vehicles, namely, Mercedes Benz cars, in Hong Kong. The first of the theft charges particularized that he and the six named