Read the full judgment text of CACC 000506/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 April 2005.
1. Most of the proceedings in this application for leave to appeal against sentence were held in camera following the procedure laid down in HKSAR v Tse Ka-wah [1998] 1 HKLRD 925 where this court adopted the Sivan procedure (see: R v Sivan and Ors [1988] 87 Cr. App. R. 407). The single point at issue was whether the applicant should receive an additional discount on the sentence he received for “significant mitigation” which had not been made available to the judge in the court below. The sugg
Cites 1 case