Read the full judgment text of FAMV 6/2004 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 7 July 2005 before Hon Rogers VP, Le Pichon JA, A Cheung J.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal to Court of Final Appeal – s.22(1)(a) Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance – claim for compensation – unliquidated claim – whether claim in respect of property or civil right valued over $1 million – distinction between property right and unliquidated damages – s.22(1)(b) – great general or public importance – construction of s.12(aa) Lands Resumption Ordinance (Cap 124) – application refused – applicant granted leave to file notice of motion for leave to appeal after judgment in FACV No. 11 of 2005
Legal issues: Leave to appeal under s.22(1)(a) – value of claim · Leave to appeal under s.22(1)(b) – great general or public importance
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused. Applicant granted leave to file a notice of motion for leave to appeal within 14 days after the judgment of the Court of Final Appeal in FACV No. 11 of 2005.
Cited by 1 case