Read the full judgment text of FAMC 000058/2005 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 3 October 2005.
1. The applicant and his co-accused were convicted after trial in the District Court on a charge jointly laid against them of offering advantages to an agent, contrary to sections 9(2)(b) and 12(1) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap. 201. By a majority the Court of Appeal (Stuart-Moore VP and Lunn J, Stock JA dissenting) affirmed their convictions by applying the proviso. The applicant now seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. He seeks such leave on both limbs of s.32(2