Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000474/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 August 2005.
1. The Appellant was convicted after trial of one charge of blackmail, contrary to section 23(1) and (3) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 (the 1 st Charge”), two charges of common assault, contrary to common law and section 40 of the Offences Against the Person Ordinance, Cap 212 (the “2 nd Charge” and the “4 th Charge”) and one charge of doing an act tending and intended to pervert the course of public justice, contrary to common law (the “3 rd Charge”). He was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonm
Cited by 2 cases