Read the full judgment text of CACV 000054/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 7 November 2005.
1. This is a case that basically relates to the interpretation of two provisions in an employment contract. The plaintiffs, over 3,000 of them, are, or were at all material times, officers of various ranks in the Correctional Services Department (“the Department”) which runs all of the prisons and correctional institutions in Hong Kong. The plaintiffs’ claim is for recompense for the “overnight on call duty” (“OOCD”) that they were required by the Department to perform.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case