HKSAR v. Li Defan and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACC 520/2000 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 31 July 2001.
1. Having considered the application and counsel's arguments, we do not think that this is an appropriate case for us to grant a Certificate under section 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484. This applies to all the points raised in the application. The application is therefore refused.
Cited by 6 cases
|
CACC000520A/2000 CACC 520/2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 520 OF 2000 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 265 & 580 OF 2000) _______________________________
_______________________________ Coram: Hon Stuart-Moore Ag CJHC, Woo JA and Burrell J in Court Date of hearing: 31 July 2001 Date of judgment: 31 July 2001 ________________ J U D G M E N T ________________ Hon Woo JA (giving the judgment of the Court): 1. Having considered the application and counsel's arguments, we do not think that this is an appropriate case for us to grant a Certificate under section 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484. This applies to all the points raised in the application. The application is therefore refused.
Representation: Mr Stanley Chan, SADPP (Ag.) of Department of Justice for the Respondent (HKSAR) Mr Andrew Macrae, SC and Ms Maggie Wong Pui-kei instructed by M/S Haldanes for the 1st and 2nd Appellants (Defendants) |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 520/2000