Read the full judgment text of CACV 000191/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 March 2006.
1. I have had the advantage of reading in draft the judgment of Tang JA. I agree with the reasons he gives in paras. 2 to 37 of his judgment dismissing the appeal and the answers to the questions in the case stated as proposed in para. 63. As it is unnecessary to consider the second issue given the clear answer to the first issue, for my part, I consider it preferable not to express any views as to the merits of the second issue.
Cited by 1 case