Read the full judgment text of FACV 000028/2005 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 3 May 2006 before Ribeiro PJ.
Civil procedure – appeal – further evidence – jurisdiction of single permanent judge – s.46(2) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance – whether granting leave to adduce further evidence involves decision of appeal – held: single permanent judge has jurisdiction – Ladd v Marshall principles – consent order – directions for filing evidence – costs in appeal – Airport Authority Hong Kong – judicial review – post-hearing evidence – discretion to grant relief – incidental order – Wong Tak Yue v Kung Kwok Wai distinguished – PCCW-HKT Telephone Limited v The Telecommunications Authority cited.
Legal issues: Jurisdiction of single permanent judge to grant leave to adduce further evidence
Outcome: Application for leave to adduce further evidence granted; directions given.