Aqua-leisure Industries, Inc. and Another v. Impag Toys Europe Bv and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 3933/2000 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 May 2006.

1. The word “quality” at paragraph 84, 2 nd line should be “qualify”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 3933/2000
Court
High Court CFI
Date04 May 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 3933/2000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 3933 OF 2000

______________________

BETWEEN

  AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES, INC. 1st Plaintiff
  GREYLAND TRADING LIMITED 2nd Plaintiff
  and   
  IMPAG TOYS EUROPE BV
(formerly known as Impag B.V.)
1st Defendant
  IMPAG HK LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  YOUNG ARTIST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 3rd Defendant
  GEERT De VRIES 4th Defendant
  LIN YALING, CONNIE 5th Defendant
  SPLASH LIMITED fka AQUA SPLASH LIMITED 6th Defendant
 

Before : Hon Sakhrani J in Court

Date of Hearing : 23 - 27 January 2006, 1-3, 6 - 10, 13-15, 17, 20-23 February 2006,  8 - 10, 13 - 15 March 2006

Date of Judgment : 4 May 2006

______________________

C O R R I G E N D A

______________________

Please note the following typos in the judgment handed down on 4 May 2006 :

1. The word “quality” at paragraph 84, 2nd line should be “qualify”.

2. The words “and properly with to use in relation their goods” at paragraph 118, page 38, line C should be “and properly wish to use in relation to their goods”.

3. The word “packages” at paragraph 236, line K should read “packaging”.

Dated the 9th day of May 2006.

  (Gladys Cheng)
Clerk to the Hon Sakhrani J