Read the full judgment text of CACC 000012/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 June 2006.
1. These applicants for leave to appeal against conviction were tried in the High Court, a choice of venue that surprises us given that it was a complicated conspiracy to defraud in respect of which there was never a prospect of a sentence exceeding the maximum term that District Court judges are entitled to impose. In the event the sentences imposed on these two applicants were two and a half years and three and a half years’ imprisonment respectively. Nine jurors were empanelled and, day aft
Cited by 1 case