Amcor Ltd and Another v. California Air Ltd and Another

HCA 2544/2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 2544 OF 2005

____________

BETWEEN

__________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Muttrie in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 25-26 May 2006

Date of Judgment: 23 June 2006

______________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

______________________

1. Heading, Page 1, ‘CALIFORNIA LIMITED’ should be read as ‘CALIFORNIA AIR LIMITED’

2. Paragraph 49, Page 2, ‘Obviously the plaintiffs thought they had a claim………’ should be read as , ‘Obviously the defendants thought they had a claim………’

Dated the 2^nd day of July 2006