Amcor Ltd and Another v. California Air Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2544/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 June 2006.
1. Heading, Page 1, ‘CALIFORNIA LIMITED’ should be read as ‘CALIFORNIA AIR LIMITED’
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2544/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 2544 OF 2005 ____________ BETWEEN
__________ Before: Deputy High Court Judge Muttrie in Chambers Date of Hearing: 25-26 May 2006 Date of Judgment: 23 June 2006 ______________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ______________________ 1. Heading, Page 1, ‘CALIFORNIA LIMITED’ should be read as ‘CALIFORNIA AIR LIMITED’ 2. Paragraph 49, Page 2, ‘Obviously the plaintiffs thought they had a claim………’ should be read as , ‘Obviously the defendants thought they had a claim………’ Dated the 2nd day of July 2006
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2544/2005