Three Weekly Ltd v. Obscene Articles Tribunal and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 42/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 June 2006.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 42/2003
Court
High Court CFI
Date29 Jun 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 42/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

NO. 42 OF 2003

______________________

BETWEEN

  THREE WEEKLY LIMITED Applicant
  and  
  OBSCENE ARTICLES TRIBUNAL 1st Respondent
  COMMISSIONER FOR TELEVISION AND ENTERTAINMENT LICENSING AUTHORITY 2nd Respondent

______________________

AND

HCAL 43/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

NO. 43 OF 2003

______________________

BETWEEN

  THREE WEEKLY LIMITED Applicant
  and  
  COMMISSIONER FOR TELEVISION AND ENTERTAINMENT LICENSING AUTHORITY Respondent

____________

Before: Hon Lam J in Court

Dates of Hearing: 3, 4 March 2004 and 13 June 2006

Date of Judgment: 29 June 2006

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Page   5, line Q : delete “were”
Page 13, line G : “a” should be inserted between “is and case”
Page 15, line I : “determination” should be substituted by “decision”
Page 26, line T : “52” should be substituted by “53”
Page 29, line N : “of” should be substituted by “for”
Page 38, line D : delete “that”

Dated the 5th day of July 2006

  (C.M. LEE)(Ms.)
Clerk to Hon Lam J