Anderson Asphalt Ltd and Others v. Town Planning Board and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 61/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 July 2006.

1. This is the 2 nd respondent’s application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal against the costs order absolute dated 1 June 2006 (and for related relief if leave is given).

Cited by 4 cases

Case No.HCAL 61/2003
Court
High Court CFI
Date21 Jul 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 61/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 61 OF 2003

____________

BETWEEN

  ANDERSON ASPHALT LIMITED,
ASPHALT SURFACES (INT’L) LIMITED, PIONEER ASPHALTS (HONG KONG) LIMITED, TARMAC ASPHALT HONG KONG LIMITED
Applicants
  and  
  TOWN PLANNING BOARD 1st Respondent
  MAN FAI TAI ENTERPRISE LIMITED
trading as MAN WAH COMPANY
2nd Respondent

____________

Before:  Hon Chung J in Chambers

Date of Hearing:  21 July 2006

Date of Decision:  21 July 2006

___________________________

DECISION  ON  COSTS

___________________________

1.This is the 2nd respondent’s application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal against the costs order absolute dated 1 June 2006 (and for related relief if leave is given).

2.Very briefly, I agree with the submissions of the applicants and disagree with those of the 2nd respondent.

3.Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

   (Andrew Chung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Anthony Ismail, instructed by Messrs Johnson, Stokes & Master, for the Applicants

Not appearing, of Secretary for Justice, for the 1st Respondent

Mr Alan Hoo, SC leading Mr Alfred Chan, instructed by Messrs Fred Kan & Co., for the 2nd Respondent