Anderson Asphalt Ltd and Others v. Town Planning Board and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 61/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 June 2006.
1. In exercising my discretion as to the costs of this judicial review application, I consider it proper to take into account the observations made by the Court of Appeal in Shiu Wing Steel Ltd v Director of Environmental Protection and Another , CACV 350/2003 (18 March 2005), especially at paragraph 158(1) to (3).
Cites 2 cases
|
HCAL 61/2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 61 OF 2003 ____________ BETWEEN
____________ Before: Hon Chung J in Chambers Date of Hearing: 1 June 2006 Date of Decision: 1 June 2006 ____________________________ DECISION ON COSTS ____________________________ 1.In exercising my discretion as to the costs of this judicial review application, I consider it proper to take into account the observations made by the Court of Appeal in Shiu Wing Steel Ltd v Director of Environmental Protection and Another, CACV 350/2003 (18 March 2005), especially at paragraph 158(1) to (3). 2.With those matters in mind, I do not find that this judicial review application was one where there was a separate issue on which the 2nd Respondent was entitled to be heard, or that there was an interest which justifies separate representation. 3.Accordingly, there will be an order in terms of paragraph 1 of the applicants’ summons dated 3 April 2006.
Mr Anthony Ismail, instructed by Messrs Johnson, Stokes & Master, for the Applicants Not appearing of Secretary for Justice for the 1st Respondent Mr Alfred H H Chan, instructed by Messrs Fred Kan & Co., for the 2nd Respondent |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 61/2003