Read the full judgment text of CACC 001081/1981 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The first defendant was convicted of keeping a vice establishment, contrary to section 139(a) of the Crimes Ordinance. The second defendant was convicted of managing a vice establishment contrary to section 139(b) of the Crimes Ordinance. The third and fourth defendants were convicted of assisting in the management of a vice establishment, also contrary to section 139(b) of the Crimes Ordinance.
Cited by 4 cases