1638 Ltd v. Power Cycles Ltd

Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 18 August 2006.

1. On page 1 at line 7, the Applicant’s name of “1628 LIMITED” should be replaced by the words of “1638 LIMITED”;

Cites 1 case

Case No.
Court
Date18 Aug 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

LDBM 35 of 2006

IN THE LANDS TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

BUILDING MANAGEMENT APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2006

_______________________

BETWEEN

  1638 LIMITED Applicant
  And  
  POWER CYCLES LIMITED Respondent

_______________________

Coram:  Member W. K. LO

Dates of hearing:   19, 20 and 21 July 2006

Date of judgment: 18 August 2006

 

______________________  

C O R R I G E N D A

______________________

 

1.On page 1 at line 7, the Applicant’s name of “1628 LIMITED” should be replaced by the words of “1638 LIMITED”;

2.At paragraph 26, the words of lines 11 and 12 (i.e. “been given by the common owner.  In either scenario, there would be either consent or acquiescence from the owner of the 1/F Premises as a result of”) should be deleted; and

3.The last paragraph no. of “28” should be replaced by the no. of “29”.

  (W. K. LO)
Member, Lands Tribunal

Dated this the 28th day of August 2006