1638 Ltd v. Power Cycles Ltd
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 18 August 2006.
1. On page 1 at line 7, the Applicant’s name of “1628 LIMITED” should be replaced by the words of “1638 LIMITED”;
Cites 1 case
|
LDBM 35 of 2006 IN THE LANDS TRIBUNAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION BUILDING MANAGEMENT APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2006 _______________________ BETWEEN
_______________________ Coram: Member W. K. LO Dates of hearing: 19, 20 and 21 July 2006 Date of judgment: 18 August 2006
______________________ C O R R I G E N D A ______________________
1.On page 1 at line 7, the Applicant’s name of “1628 LIMITED” should be replaced by the words of “1638 LIMITED”; 2.At paragraph 26, the words of lines 11 and 12 (i.e. “been given by the common owner. In either scenario, there would be either consent or acquiescence from the owner of the 1/F Premises as a result of”) should be deleted; and 3.The last paragraph no. of “28” should be replaced by the no. of “29”.
Dated this the 28th day of August 2006 |
Cases cited in this judgment