Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000107/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 September 2006.
1. The respondents were charged with having committed buggery with each other, otherwise than in private, contrary to section 18F(1) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200. Following the respondents’ pleas of not guilty, counsel for the respondents applied for a stay of proceedings on the basis that section 118F(1) of the Crimes Ordinance was unconstitutional. Mr John Glass, Permanent Magistrate, dismissed the charges against each of the respondents on the ground that section 118F(1) was unconstitu
Cites 2 cases