Yeung Chun Pong and Others v. Secretary for Justice
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 1 December 2006.
1. The respondent submits that costs should follow the event and should be awarded to it. This is conceded by the appellants. Accordingly, the Court makes an order that costs be awarded to the respondent.
|
FACC No. 3 of 2006 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FINAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2006 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 102 OF 2005) _____________________ Between :
_____________________ Court : Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Sir Anthony Mason NPJ Date of Judgment : 1 December 2006 __________________________ JUDGMENT ON COSTS __________________________ Chief Justice Li: 1.The respondent submits that costs should follow the event and should be awarded to it. This is conceded by the appellants. Accordingly, the Court makes an order that costs be awarded to the respondent.
Written submissions from Messrs Lau, Chan & Ko for the appellants Written submissions from Mr Kevin P Zervos SC (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent |