Sunley Engineering & Construction Co Ltd v. Ngo Kee Construction Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 49/2002 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 13 December 2006 before The Honourable Mr Justice Burrell.

Construction and arbitration dispute between SUNLEY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. and NGO KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. proceeded before The Honourable Mr Justice Burrell in the High Court of Hong Kong. The judgment delivered on 13 December 2006 was subsequently corrected by corrigenda issued on 10 January 2007, addressing numerical corrections including sums related to agreed variations, contract sums, and specific financial figures within the judgment text. The record notes dates of hearing and submission of final written submissions. No explicit legal issues or substantive outcomes were detailed in the corrigenda notice.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 49/2002
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date13 Dec 2006
JudgeThe Honourable Mr Justice Burrell
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 49/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 49 OF 2002

----------------------------

BETWEEN

  SUNLEY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. Plaintiff
  and  
  NGO KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. Defendant

------------------------

Before : The Honourable Mr Justice Burrell in Court

Dates of Hearing : 3 – 6, 9 – 12 October 2006

Date of Submission of Written Final Submissions : 3 November 2006

Date of Judgment :  13 December 2006

----------------------

CORRIGENDA

----------------------

Kindly note the following corrections in the aforesaid Judgment:

(1)     At page 22, paragraph 74, after item (13) add the following:

“(14)   Agreed variations           517,018”

(2)     At page 22, paragraph 74, line P, the sum “7,592,858” should read “8,109,876”.

(3)     At page 35, paragraph 115, line S, the figure “$6,843,309” should read “$7,360,327”.

(4)     At page 35, paragraph 115, line T, the date “21 June 2001” should read “2 June 2001”.

(5)     At page 36, paragraph 115, line B, the figure “$2,571,583” should read “$2,764,659.81”.

(6)     At page 36, paragraph 115, line C, the figure “$1,687” should read “$1,764.46”.

Dated the 10th day of January, 2007.

  (Eva LEE) (Ms)
Clerk to Hon Burrell J