Lee Sik Yee v. Lo Wing Hong and Another

Case No.HCPI 21/2006
Court
High Court CFI
Date18 Jan 2007
Judge—
Case Document
100%

HCPI 21/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 21 OF 2006

____________

BETWEEN

  LEE SIK YEE, the Administratrix of the estate of Kwok Hing Cheung, deceased Plaintiff
  and  
  LO WING HONG 1st Defendant
  SUN ALLIANCE AND LONDON INSURANCE PLC 2nd Defendant

____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Muttrie in Court

Dates of Trial: 28-29 November 2006

Date of Judgment: 18 January 2007

______________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

______________________

Paragraph 15, page 5

‘He entered the Chinese University in about September 2005.  Until then his loss would be $1,740 (household expenses) plus $2,500 (education expenses) for 14 months, i.e. $59,630.’ should be changed to ‘He entered the Chinese University in about September 2005.  Until then his loss would be $1,740 (household expenses) plus $2,500 (education expenses) for 14 months, i.e. $59,360.’

Paragraph 19, page 5

‘The total pre-trial loss of dependency is therefore $266,842.’ should be changed to ‘The total pre-trial loss of dependency is therefore $276,842.’

Paragraph 37, page 10

The award will be as follows:

Statutory Bereavement $150,000.00
Pre-trial loss of dependency $266,842.00
Post-trial loss of dependency $520,652.00
Loss of accumulation of wealth $450,000.00
Damaged and lost properties $3,000.00
Funeral expenses $90,363.00
Total $1,480,857.00
  ==========

should be changed to as follows:-

The award will be as follows:

Statutory Bereavement

$150,000.00

Pre-trial loss of dependency

$276,842.00

Post-trial loss of dependency

$520,652.00

Loss of accumulation of wealth

$500,000.00

Damaged and lost properties

$3,000.00

Funeral expenses $90,363.00
Total $1,540,857.00
  ===========

Dated the 26th day of January 2007

  K. Chang
Clerk to Muttrie DHCJ

Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 21/2006