Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000046/2006 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Applicant claims against the 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent for employees' compensation under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance, Cap. 282 ("the Ordinance"). The Applicant claims against the 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent in the alternative that one of them was his employer. The Applicant also takes the fall back position that, even if the 2nd Respondent were not his direct employer, the 2nd Respondent is nevertheless liable towards him as the principal contractor of the
Cites 6 cases