Wong Lan and Another v. Hong Chang Construction Transportation Engineering Co Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 973/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 May 2007.

1.     the word “ Judgment” appearing on P.1 line Q should be replaced by “Decision”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 973/2005
Court
High Court CFI
Date25 May 2007
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 973/2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 973 OF 2005

____________

BETWEEN

  WONG LAN and CHEUNG SO KUEN
the personal representatives of
PANG KAR PING, deceased
Plaintiffs
  and  
  HONG CHANG CONSTRUCTION
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
1st Defendant
  HOP LEE BUILDERS CO. LTD. 2nd Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Fung J in Chambers (Open to public)

Date of Hearing: 7 May 2007

Date of Decision: 25 May 2007

CORRIGENDUM

Kindly note the following corrections in the Decision of the above-mentioned case given by the Honourable Mr. Justice Fung on 25 May 2007.

1.     the word “ Judgment” appearing on P.1 line Q should be replaced by “Decision”.

2.    the words “did have no reasonable prospect” appearing on P.22 line O & line P should be replaced by “did have reasonable prospect”.

Dated the 28th day of May, 2007

 

C.S. WONG
Clerk to Hon. Fung J