Lau Chok Ting v. Chun Wo Construction and Engineering Co Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 1169/2004 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 June 2007.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 1169/2004
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Jun 2007
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 1169/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 1169 OF 2004

-----------------------------

BETWEEN

  LAU CHOK TING Plaintiff
  and  
  CHUN WO CONSTRUCTION AND  
  ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED 1st Defendant
  LEUNG CHI PLASTERING COMPANY LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  TUNG SHIH KWOK (董是國) 3rd Defendant

-----------------------------

Before : Hon Yam J in Court

Dates of Hearing : 18-20 April 2007

Date of Judgment : 11 June 2007

-------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

-------------------------

Kindly note the following corrections in the written judgment of the above-mentioned case handed down by the Honourable Mr Justice Yam in Court on 11 June 2007 :-

(1) in paragraph 36 of page 12,
  in the eighth line of paragraph 36 is amended by adding at the end after the full-stop “The total amount he received by cheques was $38,300.”;
(2) in paragraph 54 of page 16,
  (a) the figure in item (ii) should read “$14,000 x 7.75 less $38,300” instead of “$14,000 x 7.75” ; and the sum  should be “$70,200” instead of “$108,500”;
  (b) the figure in item (iii) should read “($14,000 - $6,000) x 44” instead of “($14,000 - $6,000) x 45”; and the sum should be “352,000” instead of “$432,000”; and the total should be “$607,000” instead of “$725,300”;
(3) in paragraph 56 of page 17,
  the figure should read “$607,000” instead of “$725,300”; and the total should be “$543,000” instead of “$661,300”;
(4) in paragraph 76 of page 22,
  the figure in item (ii) should read “$543,000” instead of “$661,300”; and the total should be “$853,449” instead of “$971,749”.

Dated the 7th day of August, 2007

  (Racy IP)(Ms)
Clerk to Hon. Yam, J.
   
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 1169/2004