Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 003815/2005 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 September 2007.
1. This is a claim made by the Plaintiff for the return of a deposit in the sum of $300,000 from the Defendant which was given under an agreement. The agreement was undated but was reached in or about September 2001 (Bundle C at p.269). The agreement related to the use of the Facilities in the tea garden belonging to the Defendant. The Facilities have 3 main components which are related to the counterclaim made by the Defendant. It comprises of: