Wong Ching Wan v. A S Watson & Co Ltd
Read the full judgment text of DCEC 770/2005 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
33. The starting point is that subject to section 53 of the District Court Ordinance Cap.336 and Order 62 rule 2(4) of the RDC, the court has a complete discretion on costs. The cardinal rule is that costs should follow event except when it appears to the court that in the circumstances of the case some other order should be made (see Order 63 62 rule 3(2) of the RDC).
|
DCEC770/2005 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION CASE NO. 770 OF 2005 ____________ BETWEEN
------------------------
Coram: H H Judge Marlene Ng in Chambers (open to the public) Date of Hearing: 30th May, 2007 Date of Further Written submissions by the Applicant: 22nd June, 2007 Date of Further Written submissions by the Respondent: 20th June, 2007 Date of Handing Down Decision: 25th June, 2007 ______________________ CORRIGENDUM ______________________
Paragraph 33 on page 11 of the Decision should read: 33.The starting point is that subject to section 53 of the District Court Ordinance Cap.336 and Order 62 rule 2(4) of the RDC, the court has a complete discretion on costs. The cardinal rule is that costs should follow event except when it appears to the court that in the circumstances of the case some other order should be made (see Order 63 62 rule 3(2) of the RDC). Dated this 23rd day of October, 2007
|
Further hearings and rulings under DCEC 770/2005