Goldenwick Ltd v. Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2634/2004 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 March 2008.
1. Paragraph 87, line 4, “subject to and will the benefit” should read as “subject to and with the benefit”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2634/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 2634 OF 2004 --------------------- BETWEEN
--------------------- AND ACTION NO. 2645 OF 2004 --------------------- BETWEEN
--------------------- (Consolidated pursuant to the Order of Before : Hon Poon J in Court Dates of Hearing : 25, 28 and 29 May and 17–19 December 2007 Date of Decision : 20 March 2008 ----------------------- CORRIGENDA ----------------------- Kindly note the following corrections in the judgment of the above cases dated 20 March 2008: - 1. Paragraph 87, line 4, “subject to and will the benefit” should read as “subject to and with the benefit”. 2. Paragraph 97, line 2 and paragraph 98, line 3, “condoned off” should read as “cordoned off”. 3. Paragraph 98, line 1, “ a glass panels” should read as “a glass panel”. Dated this 16th day of May 2008.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2634/2004