YUEN CHUN WAH v KANSON CRANE SERVICE COMPANY LIMITED

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 000893/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 June 2008.

1. The 2 nd and 3 rd Defendants together have made payment into court which was accepted by the Plaintiff.  The outstanding issue is who should bear the costs of the Plaintiff in claiming against the 1 st Defendant (“P’s costs”) and costs of the 1 st Defendant in defending the Plaintiff’s claim (“D1’s costs”).

Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases