|
HCA 1049/2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
ACTION NO. 1049 OF 2007
-------------------------
BETWEEN
| |
LAU KING TING KATIE |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
CHENG MIU HAR STELLA |
1st Defendant |
| |
LAU AND COMPANY (HOLDINGS) LTD. |
2nd Defendant |
| |
PAK MIU INVESTMENT CO. LTD. |
3rd Defendant |
| |
LAU AND CHENG INVESTMENT LTD. |
4th Defendant |
| |
FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD. |
5th Defendant |
| |
(by original action) |
|
AND BETWEEN
| |
CHENG MIU HAR STELLA |
1st Plaintiff |
| |
LAU AND COMPANY (HOLDINGS) LTD. |
2nd Plaintiff |
| |
PAK MIU INVESTMENT CO. LTD. |
3rd Plaintiff |
| |
LAU AND CHENG INVESTMENT LTD. |
4th Plaintiff |
| |
FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD. |
5th Plaintiff |
| |
And |
|
| |
LAU KING TING KATIE |
1st Defendant |
| |
LAU PAK CHAI, EDMUND |
2nd Defendant |
| |
(by counterclaim) |
|
-----------------------
Before : Deputy High Court Judge J. Harris, S.C. in Chambers
Date of Hearing : 23-24 January 2008
Date of Judgment : 14 May 2008
-----------------------
CORRIGENDA
-----------------------
1.At page 6 paragraph 19, the fifth line should read:
“….interlocutory injunction, namely, that there is a serious question to be tried,….”
2.At page 13 paragraph 33, the first sentence should read:
“The catalyst for this change of story was the filing of the 1st report of Dr. Sheila Hamilton on behalf of the 1st Defendant.”
3.At page 17 paragraph 43, the first sentence should read:
“The Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the 1st Defendant from disposing of the assets of the 2nd to 4th Defendants.”
4.At page 20 paragraph 49, the first sentence should read:
“I accept that as a general principle the court only acts to restrain a liquidator if it is demonstrated that the liquidator has acted mala fide or in a way which no reasonable liquidator should act.”
Dated the 27th day of June 2008
| |
(S.M. Kwan)(Ms)
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge J. Harris, S.C. |
|