Read the full judgment text of HCMA 486/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 February 2006.
1. The Appellant was convicted after trial on three counts of “fraud”, contrary to section 16A of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210 of the Laws of Hong Kong, and one count of “being an agent, using a document with intent to deceive his principal”, contrary to sections 9(3) and 12(1) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap. 201 of the Laws of Hong Kong. The Appellant now appeals against conviction.